I was perusing through Lady Bunny’s blog page, when I ran into the Ellen DeGeneres video addressing the murder of Lawrence King, 15 who was killed by a 16 year old classmate. I’ve seen the video in many other blog sites after that. I was genuinely touched by Ellen’s plea for all of us to “change the message” as well as for her important declaration, that neither Larry King, a 15 year old gender non-conforming adolescent (who self-identified as gay) nor herself, a 50 year old white gender non-conforming person are second class citizens. And, isn’t that what we all strive for? First Class Citizenship, not the other one(s). We know too well the differences. These differences are shoved in our faces most days of our lives. They are mainly shown to us through exclusions, exclusions from neighborhoods, exclusions from families, exclusions from peace, exclusions from better (or any) jobs, exclusion from political candidates’ speeches and national parties platforms, exclusion from the basic definition of human being. This list can go on, and on, and on.

But what is “the message” that must be changed? Or who is sending it? I propose the answer to this is very complex. Recently The Advocate tried to address the issue from a different perspective, wondering whether we, as a community (LGBT) are sending mixed messages. This effort, I am sure was as well intended as misguided, and has elicit several responses. However, I think is worthy to explore what messages our allies and we as a community are sending that may be supportive of the idea that gender non-conforming folks as well as trans folks are indeed second class citizens, therefore unworthy. This is where Senator Kennedy fits in this post. Senator Kennedy announced he will push ENDA in the senate without protections for trans or gender non-conforming folks. Bill Browning at The Bilerico Project asked the right question:

“George W has already said he’d veto the legislation. Today’s million dollar question? What’s the rush if it’s not going to make it into law to start with? Why alienate a large segment of the LGBT community? “

I propose that the issue of ENDA and the staunch opposition to include transgender protections from employment discrimination by some elected officials that we consider allies, as well as some LG groups indeed sends a message. It says to me that trans and gender non-conforming folks are indeed second class citizens even within their/our own communities.

The rift caused across our communities nationally as well as the angry tone (on both sides,) for or against gender expression protections in this legislation, contributes to an environment that may be more fertile for transphobes and their ilk, to act on their hate, or contempt of trans and gender non-conforming people. The opposition by congress to listen to a huge coalition of groups and individuals that demanded the restoration of protections to trans and gender nonconforming folks indeed sends the wrong message, it establishes a hierarchy, it shows who is disposable, it shows who we are willing to alienate.

We can make a list of groups we alienate, immigrants of color; people on the sex-work industry; homeless people, transgender people, poor people, and a common characteristic we will find is how much violence these groups face on a daily basis. The level of alienation from society and the lack of protections society extends to its first class citizens becomes evident as the violence becomes endemic to their being.

I am not saying Senator Kennedy, or Congressman Frank or even the Human Rights Campaign Fund, want this as a result of their dismissal of trans people. I am not saying that because of their unwillingness to stand up to trans phobia and gender expression discrimination, violence is inflicted on these groups. What I am saying is that every time a politician fails to stand up and include gender expression in a diversity curriculum in school, every time a politician says she/he does not “understand” this thing about gender expression, there is a message. Every time an executive director goes back in his words and refuses to use his/her organization’s resources to include transgender people and there is NO consequences, there is, again the message, loud and clear: Transgender people are expendable; we will not go the extra mile for them; we can lie to or betray them without serious consequences; these messages whether intended or not can contribute to the climate of intolerance against transgender individuals. I’ve seen some very angry letters demanding restoration of transgender protections to ENDA, I have also seen some very hateful letters opposing it. In such climate of intolerance, violence thrives. We should be aware of this.

p.s. For the record Cyborg Yoryie only supports a strong ENDA with protections for gender identity and expression included in the legislation.